🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid wider concerns about industry interference with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials issued a warning that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the bill passes.

International experts specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.